[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOPLpQdi-8NZL1rwt3APU_is4GcyGaAN0Vq0T23BMSHob--YYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:04:26 -0400
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
lenb@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SNB PCI root information
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> I mean, if we create a parameter space that tweaks data then why
> not make it complete and allow *all* firmware data to be
> (optionally) modified, from the kernel boot line?
If there is proof that BIOSes get it wrong then just use this small
additional patch:
Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...il.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
index fc09c27..7aceb84 100644
--- a/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/x86/pci/acpi.c
@@ -387,16 +387,16 @@ struct pci_bus * __devinit
pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root)
return NULL;
}
- node = -1;
+ node = get_mp_bus_to_node(busnum);
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
- pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
- if (pxm >= 0)
- node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
- if (node != -1)
- set_mp_bus_to_node(busnum, node);
- else
+ if (node == -1) {
+ pxm = acpi_get_pxm(device->handle);
+ if (pxm >= 0)
+ node = pxm_to_node(pxm);
+ if (node != -1)
+ set_mp_bus_to_node(busnum, node);
+ }
#endif
- node = get_mp_bus_to_node(busnum);
if (node != -1 && !node_online(node))
node = -1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists