lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE2F51C.1060106@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:19:08 +0800
From:	"gnehzuil.lzheng@...il.com" <gnehzuil.lzheng@...il.com>
To:	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
CC:	Sami Kerola <kerolasa@...il.com>, Sami Kerola <kerolasa@....fi>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Bernhard Voelker <mail@...nhard-voelker.de>,
	Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: block: update ioprio.txt

On 06/21/2012 12:50 PM, Rob Landley wrote:

> On 06/19/2012 05:27 AM, Zheng Liu wrote:
>> Hi Sami,
>>
>> [You forgot to CC'd other developers and mailing list]
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:54:41AM +0200, Sami Kerola wrote:
>>> Hi Zheng,
>>>
>>> Wouldn't a patch such as below be better?
>>
>> Looks good to me.  But, IMHO, if reader cannot access Internet, my patch
>> maybe is better for them.  The original writer is not me.  So I don't
>> understand the original idea that puts ionice source code in here.  I
>> think that Jens can do the final decision.
>>
>> Hi Jens,
>>
>> What's your opintion about Sami's and my patch?
> 
> I note that it's nice to have a reference implementation for nontrivial
> things. Also, util-linux isn't the end-all and be-all of linux
> userspace: busybox has an ionice, and I plan to add an ionice
> implementation to toybox as well.
> 
> So fixing reference code is good. That said, this isn't a "fix", this is
> a rewrite adding all sorts of unnecessary complexity
> (internationalization? strtos32_or_error() instead of strtol()?) that
> makes it much _less_ effective as reference code.


OK.  I will repost a second version later.

Regards,
Zheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ