[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE27471.8050505@xenotime.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:10:09 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 20 (hweight return type)
On 06/20/2012 12:35 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20120619:
Someone changes the return type of __const_hweight8() to
(unsigned long). That causes printk format warnings when
hweight8/16() etc. is passed a constant:
drivers/input/joystick/analog.c:412:4: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long unsigned int'
drivers/input/joystick/analog.c:412:4: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int'
drivers/input/joystick/analog.c:416:5: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'long unsigned int'
Note that in
#define hweight8(w) (__builtin_constant_p(w) ? __const_hweight8(w) : __arch_hweight8(w))
__arch_hweight*() still returns unsigned int while __const_hweight*()
returns unsigned long. This can't be good, can it?
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists