[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHGf_=pjoiHQ9vxXXe-GtbkYRzhxdDhu3pf6pwDsCe5pBQE8Nw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 21:39:07 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Aaditya Kumar <aaditya.kumar.30@...il.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Accounting problem of MIGRATE_ISOLATED freed page
>> number of isolate page block is almost always 0. then if we have such counter,
>> we almost always can avoid zone->lock. Just idea.
>
> Yeb. I thought about it but unfortunately we can't have a counter for MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
> Because we have to tweak in page free path for pages which are going to free later after we
> mark pageblock type to MIGRATE_ISOLATE.
I mean,
if (nr_isolate_pageblock != 0)
free_pages -= nr_isolated_free_pages(); // your counting logic
return __zone_watermark_ok(z, alloc_order, mark,
classzone_idx, alloc_flags, free_pages);
I don't think this logic affect your race. zone_watermark_ok() is already
racy. then new little race is no big matter.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists