linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] udf: stop using s

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120621232944.GB11645@quack.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:29:44 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt

On Thu 21-06-12 15:32:43, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:44 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 04-06-12 14:46:24, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > The UDF file-system does not need the 's_dirt' superblock flag because it does
> > > not define the 'write_super()' method. This flag was set to 1 in few places and
> > > set to 0 in '->sync_fs()' and was basically useless. Stop using it because it
> > > is on its way out.
> >   Thanks. I've merged the patch to my tree.
> 
> Sorry Jan, but which one? I do not see it here at least:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs
> 
> [I am trying to find out which bits and pieces of this work are where]
  Currently it's in for_testing branch. I've pushed the tree so that you
can see it as well ;).

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/