[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1206220125410.7671@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 01:30:57 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
To: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
ohering@...e.com, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] drivers: hv: kvp
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> This patchset expands the KVP (Key Value Pair) functionality to
> implement the mechanism to get/set IP addresses in the guest. This
> functionality is used in Windows Server 2012 to implement VM
> replication functionality. The way IP configuration information
> is managed is distro specific. The current implementation supports
> RedHat way of doing things. We will expand support to other distros
> incrementally.
>
So there is going to be a continuous flow of patches to add support for
new distros (Arch Linux, Slackware, Linux Mint, SuSE, Debian, etc etc) and
if different versions of a distro handles things differently then you are
also going to deal with that? Might be fine, but it just sounds a bit
scary to me to try to support m different distros, each in n different
versions from the kernel... Couldn't this somehow be done once and for all
in a distro neutral way?
Just asking :-)
--
Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> http://www.chaosbits.net/
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists