[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FE2A825.1060103@landley.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 23:50:45 -0500
From: Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>
To: Sami Kerola <kerolasa@...il.com>, Sami Kerola <kerolasa@....fi>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Bernhard Voelker <mail@...nhard-voelker.de>,
Zheng Liu <wenqing.lz@...bao.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, util-linux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: block: update ioprio.txt
On 06/19/2012 05:27 AM, Zheng Liu wrote:
> Hi Sami,
>
> [You forgot to CC'd other developers and mailing list]
>
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:54:41AM +0200, Sami Kerola wrote:
>> Hi Zheng,
>>
>> Wouldn't a patch such as below be better?
>
> Looks good to me. But, IMHO, if reader cannot access Internet, my patch
> maybe is better for them. The original writer is not me. So I don't
> understand the original idea that puts ionice source code in here. I
> think that Jens can do the final decision.
>
> Hi Jens,
>
> What's your opintion about Sami's and my patch?
I note that it's nice to have a reference implementation for nontrivial
things. Also, util-linux isn't the end-all and be-all of linux
userspace: busybox has an ionice, and I plan to add an ionice
implementation to toybox as well.
So fixing reference code is good. That said, this isn't a "fix", this is
a rewrite adding all sorts of unnecessary complexity
(internationalization? strtos32_or_error() instead of strtol()?) that
makes it much _less_ effective as reference code.
Rob
--
GNU/Linux isn't: Linux=GPLv2, GNU=GPLv3+, they can't share code.
Either it's "mere aggregation", or a license violation. Pick one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists