[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000001cd5252$b47d2a30$1d777e90$@net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:45:33 -0700
From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
To: "'Peter Zijlstra'" <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "'Yong Zhang'" <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
"'Charles Wang'" <muming.wq@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"'Tao Ma'" <tm@....ma>,
'含黛' <handai.szj@...bao.com>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@...us.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched: Folding nohz load accounting more accurate
> On 2012.06.22 07:03 -0700, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Doug, Charles,
> Can you both confirm that the below patch is what you tested and we
> should finally be able to close this issue?
[... patch code deleted ...]
Yes, I confirm that is the patch code I am testing, back edited to my
working environment (So far, I call this "peter35").
Some more test results are attached as PNG files and tests will
continue for at least another couple of days. I can comment
further on the "finally close this issue" question then, but it
looks very good so far.
Unless I find some issue, I won't push further results to this list,
But results can be pulled from [1].
[1] http://www.smythies.com/~doug/network/load_average/peter35.html
Download attachment "one_low_freq_low_load.png" of type "image/png" (34870 bytes)
Download attachment "n_processes_peter35.png" of type "image/png" (44631 bytes)
Download attachment "high_freq_3_8.png" of type "image/png" (51476 bytes)
Download attachment "background_histograms.png" of type "image/png" (45925 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists