[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL8XpkWhFkWtdQA7egR+pOmu5TVjK7NTzeVEr=sqcmePw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 15:20:19 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Joe Korty <joe.korty@...r.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fs: make dumpable=2 require fully qualified path
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:03:27 -0700
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
>> Instead of introducing a suid_dumpable=3 mode and breaking all users
>> of mode 2, this only disables the unsafe portion of mode 2 (writing to
>> disk via relative path).
>
> It would be nicer to generate the warning at configuration time rather than
> at core-dumping time. I have a feeling that's Hard To Do, but why?
I actually feel that this is much more discoverable because anyone
trying to figure out why a crash isn't dumping core isn't going to be
looking back in time through their dmesg to find the warning from
setting the sysctl. Additionally, I think it's the same kind of thing
that the other existing "Skipping core dump" printk messages are
reporting.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists