linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: allow mount -o remount,compress=no

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 08:48:37 +0200
From:	Arnd Hannemann <arnd@...dnet.de>
To:	chris.mason@...ionio.com
CC:	dave@...os.cz, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ierdnah@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Btrfs: allow mount -o remount,compress=no

Hi Chris,

Am 16.04.2012 16:42, schrieb David Sterba:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 03:27:51PM +0200, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
>> Btrfs allows to turn on compression on a mounted and used filesystem
>> by issuing mount -o remount,compress=lzo.
>> This patch allows to turn compression off again
>> while the filesystem is mounted. As suggested by David Sterba
>> if the compress-force option was set, it is implicitly cleared
>> if compression is turned off.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arnd Hannemann <arnd@...dnet.de>
> 
> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
> 
> worked perfectly, remounting back and forth with compress=lzo =no
> -force=lzo etc, checked output via 'mount'.

How show should we proceed to get above mentioned patch
(or the similar patch from Andrei Popa) merged?

Best regards,
Arnd


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/