| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPXgP10iHmADRGQ8TvmWG3-LB7PhoVFcRTF7PDPq29CWQNu65w@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 02:34:49 +0200 From: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] syslog: fill buffer with more than a single message for SYSLOG_ACTION_READ On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:35:03PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> > Ok, so I'm confused, you want me to apply this patch and then revert a >> > different one? Which one, 4a77a5a06ec66ed05199b301e7c25f42f979afdc? >> >> b56a39ac conflicts and is replaced with that patch. >> 4a77a5a0 should stay, as it fixes an actual problem, even with the old >> code, I think. > > Ok, I'm even more confused now. Maybe I just need more coffee. > > Can you list what exactly I should do here? Should I apply this patch? > Revert some other patch? Which one(s)? Revert b56a39ac (return -EINVAL) and apply the patch from Jan. The problem b56a39ac solved , is replaced by other logic in Jan's patch. Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists