[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120626195511.GA2959@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 12:55:11 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Cc: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, yuanhan.liu@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] syslog: fill buffer with more than a single message for
SYSLOG_ACTION_READ
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:34:49AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:35:03PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ok, so I'm confused, you want me to apply this patch and then revert a
> >> > different one? Which one, 4a77a5a06ec66ed05199b301e7c25f42f979afdc?
> >>
> >> b56a39ac conflicts and is replaced with that patch.
> >> 4a77a5a0 should stay, as it fixes an actual problem, even with the old
> >> code, I think.
> >
> > Ok, I'm even more confused now. Maybe I just need more coffee.
> >
> > Can you list what exactly I should do here? Should I apply this patch?
> > Revert some other patch? Which one(s)?
>
> Revert b56a39ac (return -EINVAL) and apply the patch from Jan. The
> problem b56a39ac solved , is replaced by other logic in Jan's patch.
Ok, now done, there's nothing else needed here, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists