lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206262309301.32567@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
	cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, wency@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/12] memory-hotplug : rename remove_memory to
 offline_memory

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:

> remove_memory() does not remove memory but just offlines memory. The patch
> changes name of it to offline_memory().
> 

The kernel is never going to physically remove the memory itself, so I 
don't see the big problem with calling it remove_memory().  If you're 
going to change it to offline_memory(), which is just as good but not 
better, then I'd suggest changing add_memory() to online_memory() for 
completeness.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ