[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1206262313440.32567@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:16:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org,
cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, wency@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/12] memory-hogplug : check memory offline in
offline_pages
On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-06-26 13:28:16.743211538 +0900
> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-06-26 13:48:38.264940468 +0900
> @@ -887,6 +887,11 @@ static int __ref offline_pages(unsigned
>
> lock_memory_hotplug();
>
> + if (memory_is_offline(start_pfn, end_pfn)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
> node = zone_to_nid(zone);
> nr_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
Are there additional prerequisites for this patch? Otherwise it changes
the return value of offline_memory() which will now call
acpi_memory_powerdown_device() in the acpi memhotplug case when disabling.
Is that a problem?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists