lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:22:09 +0800
From:	Luming Yu <luming.yu@...il.com>
To:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: CPU isolation question again

Hi there,

I noticed some discussion about CPU isolation which points me to the
patch set (https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/15/245). I'm currently
preparing a RFC-patch-set to automatically pick up a few suitable CPUs
to isolate then kick them out of service for a while. We need to
balance between  thermal & power management And overall system
performance during this operation as much as possible. So
software-cpu-online-offline interface could not be a good option to
me. But to make sure I'm not blindly running on a dead-end path, I'd
check with experts here to ensure it makes some sense to isolate CPUs
to this level, and the idea also makes some sense, and the most
important is it's not implemented yet.

Thanks!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ