linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] arm: limit memblock base address for early_pte

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jun 2012 20:18:01 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	"Kim, Jong-Sung" <neidhard.kim@....com>
Cc:	'Minchan Kim' <minchan@...nel.org>,
	'Nicolas Pitre' <nico@...aro.org>,
	'Catalin Marinas' <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	'Chanho Min' <chanho.min@....com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] arm: limit memblock base address for
	early_pte_alloc

On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 10:58:50PM +0900, Kim, Jong-Sung wrote:
> > From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan@...nel.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2012 4:12 PM
> > 
> > If we do arm_memblock_steal with a page which is not aligned with section
> > size, panic can happen during boot by page fault in map_lowmem.
> > 
> > Detail:
> > 
> > 1) mdesc->reserve can steal a page which is allocated at 0x1ffff000 by
> > memblock
> >    which prefers tail pages of regions.
> > 2) map_lowmem maps 0x00000000 - 0x1fe00000
> > 3) map_lowmem try to map 0x1fe00000 but it's not aligned by section due to
> 1.
> > 4) calling alloc_init_pte allocates a new page for new pte by
> memblock_alloc
> > 5) allocated memory for pte is 0x1fffe000 -> it's not mapped yet.
> > 6) memset(ptr, 0, sz) in early_alloc_aligned got PANICed!
> 
> May I suggest another simple approach? The first continuous couples of
> sections are always safely section-mapped inside alloc_init_section funtion.
> So, by limiting memblock_alloc to the end of the first continuous couples of
> sections at the start of map_lowmem, map_lowmem can safely memblock_alloc &
> memset even if we have one or more section-unaligned memory regions. The
> limit can be extended back to arm_lowmem_limit after the map_lowmem is done.

No.  What if the first block of memory is not large enough to handle all
the allocations?

I think the real problem is folk trying to reserve small amounts.  I have
said all reservations must be aligned to 1MB.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/