lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.02.1206280019160.31003@xanadu.home>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 00:33:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>
cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] arm: limit memblock base address for
 early_pte_alloc

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Dave Martin wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 04:11:52PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > If we do arm_memblock_steal with a page which is not aligned with section size,
> > panic can happen during boot by page fault in map_lowmem.
> > 
> > Detail:
> > 
> > 1) mdesc->reserve can steal a page which is allocated at 0x1ffff000 by memblock
> >    which prefers tail pages of regions.
> > 2) map_lowmem maps 0x00000000 - 0x1fe00000
> > 3) map_lowmem try to map 0x1fe00000 but it's not aligned by section due to 1.
> > 4) calling alloc_init_pte allocates a new page for new pte by memblock_alloc
> > 5) allocated memory for pte is 0x1fffe000 -> it's not mapped yet.
> > 6) memset(ptr, 0, sz) in early_alloc_aligned got PANICed!
> > 
> > This patch fix it by limiting memblock to mapped memory range.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jongsung Kim <neidhard.kim@....com>
> > Suggested-by: Chanho Min <chanho.min@....com>
> > Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/mm/mmu.c |   37 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> >  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > index e5dad60..a15aafe 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> > @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static void __init alloc_init_pte(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
> >  
> >  static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> >  				      unsigned long end, phys_addr_t phys,
> > -				      const struct mem_type *type)
> > +				      const struct mem_type *type, bool lowmem)
> >  {
> >  	pmd_t *pmd = pmd_offset(pud, addr);
> >  
> > @@ -619,6 +619,8 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
> >  
> >  		flush_pmd_entry(p);
> >  	} else {
> > +		if (lowmem)
> > +			memblock_set_current_limit(__pa(addr));
> 
> I thought of doing something similar to this.  A concern I have is that
> when mapping the first few sections, is it guaranteed that there will be
> enough memory available below memblock.current_limit to allocate extra
> page tables, in general?  I think we could get failures here even though
> there is spare (unmapped) memory above the limit.
> 
> An alternative approach would be to install temporary section mappings
> to cover all of lowmem before starting to create the real mappings.
> The memblock allocator still knows which regions are reserved, so we
> shouldn't end up scribbling on pages which are really not supposed to
> be mapped in lowmem.
> 
> That feels like it should work, but would involve extra overheads, more
> flushing etc. to purge all those temporary section mappings from the TLB.

This is all rather fragile and inelegant.

I propose the following two patches instead -- both patches are included 
inline not to break the email thread.  What do you think?

---------- >8

From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:02:31 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: head.S: simplify initial page table mapping

Let's map the initial RAM up to the end of the kernel.bss plus 64MB
instead of the strict kernel image area.  This simplifies the code
as the kernel image only needs to be handled specially in the XIP case.
This also give some room for the early memory allocator to use before
the real mapping is finally installed with the actual amount of memory.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
index 835898e7d7..cc3103fb66 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/head.S
@@ -55,14 +55,6 @@
 	add	\rd, \phys, #TEXT_OFFSET - PG_DIR_SIZE
 	.endm
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
-#define KERNEL_START	XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR)
-#define KERNEL_END	_edata_loc
-#else
-#define KERNEL_START	KERNEL_RAM_VADDR
-#define KERNEL_END	_end
-#endif
-
 /*
  * Kernel startup entry point.
  * ---------------------------
@@ -218,51 +210,50 @@ __create_page_tables:
 	blo	1b
 
 	/*
-	 * Now setup the pagetables for our kernel direct
-	 * mapped region.
+	 * Map some RAM to cover the kernel image and its .bss section.
+	 * Push some additional 64MB to give the early memory allocator
+	 * some initial room (beware: real RAM might or might not be there
+	 * across the whole area). The real memory map will be established
+	 * (extended or shrunk) later.
 	 */
-	mov	r3, pc
-	mov	r3, r3, lsr #SECTION_SHIFT
-	orr	r3, r7, r3, lsl #SECTION_SHIFT
-	add	r0, r4,  #(KERNEL_START & 0xff000000) >> (SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
-	str	r3, [r0, #((KERNEL_START & 0x00f00000) >> SECTION_SHIFT) << PMD_ORDER]!
-	ldr	r6, =(KERNEL_END - 1)
-	add	r0, r0, #1 << PMD_ORDER
+	add	r0, r4, #PAGE_OFFSET >> (SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
+	ldr	r6, =(_end + 64 * 1024 * 1024)
+	orr	r3, r8, r7
 	add	r6, r4, r6, lsr #(SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
-1:	cmp	r0, r6
+1:	str	r3, [r0], #1 << PMD_ORDER
 	add	r3, r3, #1 << SECTION_SHIFT
-	strls	r3, [r0], #1 << PMD_ORDER
+	cmp	r0, r6
 	bls	1b
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_XIP_KERNEL
 	/*
-	 * Map some ram to cover our .data and .bss areas.
+	 * Map the kernel image separately as it is not located in RAM.
 	 */
-	add	r3, r8, #TEXT_OFFSET
-	orr	r3, r3, r7
-	add	r0, r4,  #(KERNEL_RAM_VADDR & 0xff000000) >> (SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
-	str	r3, [r0, #(KERNEL_RAM_VADDR & 0x00f00000) >> (SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)]!
-	ldr	r6, =(_end - 1)
-	add	r0, r0, #4
+#define XIP_START XIP_VIRT_ADDR(CONFIG_XIP_PHYS_ADDR)
+	mov	r3, pc
+	mov	r3, r3, lsr #SECTION_SHIFT
+	orr	r3, r7, r3, lsl #SECTION_SHIFT
+	add	r0, r4,  #(XIP_START & 0xff000000) >> (SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
+	str	r3, [r0, #((XIP_START & 0x00f00000) >> SECTION_SHIFT) << PMD_ORDER]!
+	ldr	r6, =(_edata_loc - 1)
+	add	r0, r0, #1 << PMD_ORDER
 	add	r6, r4, r6, lsr #(SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
 1:	cmp	r0, r6
-	add	r3, r3, #1 << 20
-	strls	r3, [r0], #4
+	add	r3, r3, #1 << SECTION_SHIFT
+	strls	r3, [r0], #1 << PMD_ORDER
 	bls	1b
 #endif
 
 	/*
-	 * Then map boot params address in r2 or the first 1MB (2MB with LPAE)
-	 * of ram if boot params address is not specified.
+	 * Then map boot params address in r2 if specified.
 	 */
 	mov	r0, r2, lsr #SECTION_SHIFT
 	movs	r0, r0, lsl #SECTION_SHIFT
-	moveq	r0, r8
-	sub	r3, r0, r8
-	add	r3, r3, #PAGE_OFFSET
-	add	r3, r4, r3, lsr #(SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
-	orr	r6, r7, r0
-	str	r6, [r3]
+	subne	r3, r0, r8
+	addne	r3, r3, #PAGE_OFFSET
+	addne	r3, r4, r3, lsr #(SECTION_SHIFT - PMD_ORDER)
+	orrne	r6, r7, r0
+	strne	r6, [r3]
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LL
 #if !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_ICEDCC) && !defined(CONFIG_DEBUG_SEMIHOSTING)

---------- >8

From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:58:39 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: adjust the memblock limit according to the available memory mapping

Early on the only accessible memory comes from the initial mapping
performed in head.S, minus those page table entries cleared in
prepare_page_table().  Eventually the full lowmem is available once
map_lowmem() has mapped it.  Let's have this properly reflected in the
memblock allocator limit.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
index e5dad60b55..7260e98dd4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
@@ -932,7 +932,6 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
 #endif
 	meminfo.nr_banks = j;
 	high_memory = __va(arm_lowmem_limit - 1) + 1;
-	memblock_set_current_limit(arm_lowmem_limit);
 }
 
 static inline void prepare_page_table(void)
@@ -967,6 +966,13 @@ static inline void prepare_page_table(void)
 	for (addr = __phys_to_virt(end);
 	     addr < VMALLOC_START; addr += PMD_SIZE)
 		pmd_clear(pmd_off_k(addr));
+
+	/*
+	 * The code in head.S has set a mapping up to _end + 64MB.
+	 * The code above has cleared any mapping from 'end' upwards.
+	 * Let's have this reflected in the available memory from memblock.
+	 */ 
+	memblock_set_current_limit(min(end, virt_to_phys(_end) + SZ_64M));
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
@@ -1113,6 +1119,8 @@ static void __init map_lowmem(void)
 
 		create_mapping(&map);
 	}
+
+	memblock_set_current_limit(arm_lowmem_limit);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1123,8 +1131,6 @@ void __init paging_init(struct machine_desc *mdesc)
 {
 	void *zero_page;
 
-	memblock_set_current_limit(arm_lowmem_limit);
-
 	build_mem_type_table();
 	prepare_page_table();
 	map_lowmem();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ