| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4FEBFF08.60502@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:51:52 +0900
From: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<len.brown@...el.com>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
<paulus@...ba.org>, <cl@...ux.com>, <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <wency@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/12] memory-hogplug : check memory offline in offline_pages
Hi Kosaki-san,
2012/06/28 14:26, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>> When offline_pages() is called to offlined memory, the function fails since
>> all memory has been offlined. In this case, the function should succeed.
>> The patch adds the check function into offline_pages().
>
> I don't understand your point. I think following misoperation should
> fail. Otherwise
> administrator have no way to know their fault.
>
> $ echo offline > memoryN/state
> $ echo offline > memoryN/state
>
> In general, we don't like to ignore an error except the standard require it.
I understood the intention of previous mail (why the caller can't check it? ).
I'll move memory_is_offline() to caller side.
>>
>> CC: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
>> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>> CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
>> CC: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
>> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
>> CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> CC: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
>> CC: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
>>
>> ---
>> drivers/base/memory.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/memory.h | 1 +
>> mm/memory_hotplug.c | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>
>> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/drivers/base/memory.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/drivers/base/memory.c 2012-06-26 13:28:16.726211752 +0900
>> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/drivers/base/memory.c 2012-06-26 13:34:22.423639904 +0900
>> @@ -70,6 +70,26 @@ void unregister_memory_isolate_notifier(
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_memory_isolate_notifier);
>>
>> +bool memory_is_offline(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>
> I dislike this function name. 'memory' is too vague to me.
O.K.
I retry to change the name of the function.
>
>
>> +{
>> + struct memory_block *mem;
>> + struct mem_section *section;
>> + unsigned long pfn, section_nr;
>> +
>> + for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
>> + section_nr = pfn_to_section_nr(pfn);
>> + section = __nr_to_section(section_nr);
>> + mem = find_memory_block(section);
>
> This seems to have strong sparse dependency.
Thanks.
I will consider other CONFIG_.
Thanks.
Yasuaki Ishimatsu
> Hm, I wonder why memory-hotplug.c can enable when X86_64_ACPI_NUMA.
>
> # eventually, we can have this option just 'select SPARSEMEM'
> config MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> bool "Allow for memory hot-add"
> depends on SPARSEMEM || X86_64_ACPI_NUMA
>
>
>> + if (!mem)
>> + continue;
>> + if (mem->state == MEM_OFFLINE)
>> + continue;
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * register_memory - Setup a sysfs device for a memory block
>> */
>> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/include/linux/memory.h
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/include/linux/memory.h 2012-06-25 04:53:04.000000000 +0900
>> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/include/linux/memory.h 2012-06-26 13:34:22.424639891 +0900
>> @@ -120,6 +120,7 @@ extern int memory_isolate_notify(unsigne
>> extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block_hinted(struct mem_section *,
>> struct memory_block *);
>> extern struct memory_block *find_memory_block(struct mem_section *);
>> +extern bool memory_is_offline(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn);
>> #define CONFIG_MEM_BLOCK_SIZE (PAGES_PER_SECTION<<PAGE_SHIFT)
>> enum mem_add_context { BOOT, HOTPLUG };
>> #endif /* CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_SPARSE */
>> Index: linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-3.5-rc4.orig/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-06-26 13:28:16.743211538 +0900
>> +++ linux-3.5-rc4/mm/memory_hotplug.c 2012-06-26 13:48:38.264940468 +0900
>> @@ -887,6 +887,11 @@ static int __ref offline_pages(unsigned
>>
>> lock_memory_hotplug();
>>
>> + if (memory_is_offline(start_pfn, end_pfn)) {
>> + ret = 0;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
>> node = zone_to_nid(zone);
>> nr_pages = end_pfn - start_pfn;
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
>> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
>> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
>> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists