[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <010e01cd54fa$e9c93fd0$bd5bbf70$@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 15:54:49 +0900
From: "Kim, Jong-Sung" <neidhard.kim@....com>
To: "'Nicolas Pitre'" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: "'Dave Martin'" <dave.martin@...aro.org>,
"'Minchan Kim'" <minchan@...nel.org>,
"'Russell King'" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"'Catalin Marinas'" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"'Chanho Min'" <chanho.min@....com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] [RESEND] arm: limit memblock base address for early_pte_alloc
> From: Nicolas Pitre [mailto:nicolas.pitre@...aro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:26 PM
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Kim, Jong-Sung wrote:
>
> > Thank you for your comment, Dave! It was not that sophisticated
> > choice, but I thought that normal embedded system trying to reduce the
> > BOM would have a big-enough first memblock memory region. However
> > you're right. There can be exceptional systems. Then, how do you think
> about following manner:
> [...]
>
> This still has some possibilities for failure.
>
Can you kindly describe the possible failure path?
> Please have a look at the two patches I've posted to fix this in a better
> way.
>
I'm setting up for your elegant patches. ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists