linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120628103223.GA1055@krava.redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 12:32:23 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong hw_breakpoint documentation

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:30:51AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:19:28 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:58:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 21:07 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >> > -modifier_bp    [rwx]
> >> > +modifier_bp    [rwx]{1,3}
> >> > 
> >> > and fail parse_breakpoint_type function for nonsense types
> >> 
> >> If you're going to modify parse_breakpoint_type() to fail on nonsense
> >> types, you might as well do the + thing, right?
> >> 
> >> Doesn't really matter that much though ;-)
> >
> > yo ;-)
> 
> So, are you ok to resend the original patch with your ack? Or will you
> send the above soon?

I can send the change by the end of the week

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/