linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <877gusz0hg.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 10:30:51 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jovi Zhang <bookjovi@...il.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix wrong hw_breakpoint documentation

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:19:28 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:58:22PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 21:07 +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> > -modifier_bp    [rwx]
>> > +modifier_bp    [rwx]{1,3}
>> > 
>> > and fail parse_breakpoint_type function for nonsense types
>> 
>> If you're going to modify parse_breakpoint_type() to fail on nonsense
>> types, you might as well do the + thing, right?
>> 
>> Doesn't really matter that much though ;-)
>
> yo ;-)

So, are you ok to resend the original patch with your ack? Or will you
send the above soon?

Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/