linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/16] tile/PCI: Factor 'pcibios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FEC97F8.30903@tilera.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jun 2012 13:44:24 -0400
From:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To:	Myron Stowe <mstowe@...hat.com>
CC:	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>, <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <rth@...ddle.net>,
	<ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>, <mattst88@...il.com>,
	<linux@....linux.org.uk>, <starvik@...s.com>,
	<jesper.nilsson@...s.com>, <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	<fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <monstr@...str.eu>, <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	<yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>, <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
	<deller@....de>, <benh@...nel.crashing.org>, <paulus@...ba.org>,
	<lethal@...ux-sh.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	<gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<hpa@...or.com>, <x86@...nel.org>, <chris@...kel.net>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] tile/PCI: Factor 'pcibios_setup()' out of tile

On 6/28/2012 1:30 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 09:18 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> On 6/25/2012 11:32 PM, Myron Stowe wrote:
>>> The PCI core provides a generic (__weak) 'pcibios_setup()' routine
>>> that can be used by all architectures as a default.  Drop tile's
>>> architecture specific version in favor of that as it does not need to be
>>> over-ridden.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>  arch/tile/kernel/pci.c |   10 ----------
>>>  1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>> [...]
>> In our internal tree we have x86-like support for "pci=off" here.  [...]
>> But perhaps it would make sense
>> to move the support for "pci=off" to common code, since multiple
>> architectures handle this the same way?
> Looking at the tree I only see three of the architectures currently
> using/implementing "pci=off" (four with the 'tile' addition).  Perhaps
> there is a way to avoid such but it seems like adding this to the core
> would require introducing the global variable 'pci_probe' which seems
> like unnecessary pollution?

I'd argue that the core might expose a pci_probing_disabled() function that
returns whether "pci=off" was seen, and modify the other architectures that
already support pci_probe to call that function instead.  It's true that
x86 has a much more elaborate use of pci_probe than the other
architectures, which means x86 would probably want to keep the variable
as-is and just call pci_probing_disabled() to set pci_probe to zero and return.

All that said, I'm not volunteering to make this change, so if it doesn't
seem right to you, I certainly won't insist. :-)

-- 
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/