| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 11:05:16 +0200 From: "Zoltan Kelemen" <zoltan.kelemen@...isec.se> To: "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> CC: willy@...a-x.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging:panel: Rewrite for fixing synchronization issues On 29 jun 2012 09:24 "Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote: > Gar... Don't do this. :/ Each bullet point here should be a > separate patch. Please break it apart and resend. I understand a large patch is harder to audit than small incremental changes, but the patch was the result of a code rewrite, where I attempted to summarize the changes in large in the bulleted list. There isn't a one-to-one correspondence between a bullet and a change in the code. Breaking the rewrite into small pieces would not only be quite hard but to some extent even more confusing to audit since you risk to see the leaves instead of the tree. > Do not create lock_pprt() and unlock_pprt() functions. It doesn't > save any lines of code. It means that Sparse is unable check for Good point. (The functions were a remnant from previous work-in-progress where they were used in common from process/softirq code, and used different lock calls depending on the context of the call). Regards, Zoltan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists