[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1865315-643c-44da-bbae-fd96cd2912f4@email.android.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:06:02 +0900
From: Hitoshi Mitake <h.mitake@...il.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf bench: fix confused variable namings and descriptions in mem subsystem
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 00:06:23 +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>> As Namhyung Kim pointed, there are confused namings and descriptions
>> of words "cycle" and "clock" in mem-memset.c and mem-memcpy.c.
>>
>> With the option "-c" (or "--clock", now renamed as "--cycle"), mem
>> subsystem measures cost of memset() and memcpy() with cpu-cycles
>> event.
>>
>> But current mem subsystem source code contains lots of confused
>> variable namings and descriptions with "clock" (e.g. the variable
>> use_clock). This is a very bad style because there is another
>software
>> event named "cpu-clock". This patch replaces wrong usage of "clock"
>to
>> "cycle".
>>
>
>Could you fix the Documentation/perf-bench.txt also?
>
>Thanks,
>Namhyung
Oops, sorry. I'll send the modified version later.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9. Please excuse my brevity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists