linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex issue (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4FF1A7DD.4020003@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jul 2012 09:53:33 -0400
From:	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To:	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
CC:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex issue
 (v2)



On 07/02/2012 12:12 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 11:29 AM, John Stultz wrote:
>> TODOs:
>> * Chase down the futex/hrtimer interaction to see if this could
>> be triggered in any other way.
>> * Get Tglx's input/ack
>> * Generate a backport for pre-v3.4 kernels
> So while still waiting for feedback on the clock_was_set() change, I went ahead
> and generated backports for most of the stable kernels on kernel.org.
> 

I've tested on a well-known enterprise distro ;), as well as it's more public
variant with the latest top-of-tree kernel + this second patchset across a
fairly wide selection of systems [AMD and Intel, large and small] and don't see
any issues.

(I haven't taken tglx's comments into account yet though ... this is just an
indication that the direction of the patch seems correct)

P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/