[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120702185103.GA32257@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:51:03 -0400
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] Potential fix for leapsecond caused futex issue
(v2)
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 09:12:59PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> On 07/01/2012 11:29 AM, John Stultz wrote:
> > TODOs:
> > * Chase down the futex/hrtimer interaction to see if this could
> > be triggered in any other way.
> > * Get Tglx's input/ack
> > * Generate a backport for pre-v3.4 kernels
> So while still waiting for feedback on the clock_was_set() change, I
> went ahead and generated backports for most of the stable kernels on
> kernel.org.
>
> Clearly these shouldn't go anywhere until the fix is upstream, but since
> I assume there's a number of distro developers who are likely under
> pressure to have a fix soon, I wanted to make them available so no one
> is duplicating work.
>
> You can find them here:
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/jstultz/linux.git;a=summary
>
> I did boot and test each of those kernels with my leaptest-timer.c test
> successfully.
I'm curious how the test that I did with the kernel patch,
or Richard Cochran's userspace test program didn't trigger this bug
when we tested last week.
any ideas what we missed ?
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists