[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF1C780.9020003@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:08:32 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] regulator: fixed: support deferred probe for DT GPIOs
On 07/02/2012 10:03 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 09:40:06AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 07/01/2012 12:23 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> ...this just seems rubbish, why aren't we just fixing the
>>> device tree code and why are we doing this at the device tree
>>> level rather than as a general gpiolib thing?
>
>> It is being fixed in the DT code:
>
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/18/468
>
> Is that patch actually being applied (especially with Grant's free
> time issues)? I've still got the patch sitting in my inbox since
> it wasn't clear what was going on.
It sounds like Rob Herring will be helping out on this for a few
weeks; see:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/2/3
"Re: SPI, GPIO, and DT maintainer ship (cry for help)"
I cc'd Grant and Rob to make sure.
>> However, it seemed best to make the regulator code work both
>> before and after that patch.
>
> I'd be kind of inclined to just leave it broken to be honest rather
> than having a huge comment and dodgy code.
Hmmm. That would have made it kinda hard to use:-(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists