linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] leds-mc13783: set platform data to NULL at mc13783_led

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 2 Jul 2012 23:40:50 +0530
From:	"devendra.aaru" <devendra.aaru@...il.com>
To:	Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@...onical.com>
Cc:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] leds-mc13783: set platform data to NULL at mc13783_led_remove

Hi Bryan,

I Made all the necessary changes, and it touched 21 drivers overall,
and i compile tested all except leds-sunfire as i dont have a
cross-toolchain for that.
all patches are compile tested with

gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3, ( my machine's)
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc (crosstool-NG linaro-1.13.1-2012.05-20120523 -
Linaro GCC 2012.05) 4.7.1 20120514 (prerelease) (ARM toolchain's)

at each cross-compile of a driver i selected the defconfig of each
machine, fox ex. for leds-netxbig i chose kirkwood-defconfig, and for
leds-s3c24xx i chose s3c2410_defconfig.

Now i have only 1 question in mind :).

do i need to submit all in a single patch? or patch per driver?

Thanks,
Devendra.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/