[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF47023.7080206@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Jul 2012 18:32:35 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback
and writethrough
Il 04/07/2012 18:26, Sasha Levin ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2012-07-03 at 15:19 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_blk.h b/include/linux/virtio_blk.h
>> index e0edb40..18a1027 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/virtio_blk.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/virtio_blk.h
>> @@ -37,8 +37,9 @@
>> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_RO 5 /* Disk is read-only */
>> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_BLK_SIZE 6 /* Block size of disk is available*/
>> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI 7 /* Supports scsi command passthru */
>> -#define VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH 9 /* Cache flush command support */
>> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCE 9 /* Writeback mode enabled after reset */
>> #define VIRTIO_BLK_F_TOPOLOGY 10 /* Topology information is available */
>> +#define VIRTIO_BLK_F_CONFIG_WCE 11 /* Writeback mode available in config */
>
> Wouldn't this change break any usermode code that implements virtio-blk?
No, the change is really just clarifying the existing spec, and
mandating that virtio-blk implementations follow certain assumptions of
the Linux driver.
In particular, the Linux driver is already assuming that the host
exposes VIRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH if and only if it exposes a volatile write
cache. This works because if you have a writeback cache, but provide no
way to flush it, the guest driver really cannot do anything about it
anyway. Might as well treat it as writethrough, i.e. blk_queue_flush(q, 0).
QEMU in fact has already behaved like that, and even called the flag
VIRTIO_BLK_F_WCACHE instead of VIRRTIO_BLK_F_FLUSH.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists