[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120705175723.GA3286@polaris.bitmath.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 19:57:23 +0200
From: "Henrik Rydberg" <rydberg@...omail.se>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the input-mt tree with the
input-current tree
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 10:19:05AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:57:14AM +0800, Daniel Kurtz wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > Hi Henrik,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the input-mt tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c between commit 9b7e31bbf4bb
> > > ("Input: request threaded-only IRQs with IRQF_ONESHOT") from the
> > > input-current tree and commit c2ef9a1a248b ("Input: atmel_mxt_ts - use
> > > client name for irq") from the input-mt tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> >
> > Looks good to me. Don't know if you need it for a merge, but:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
> >
>
> Hmm, maybe it is time I pull your tree?
By all means, I have nothing further planned for the merge window. I
wanted to wait until Linus pulls your current tree, then pull in the
merge conflict, then eventual reverts, then send you a pull
request. IOW, something like tomorrow. Sounds good?
Henrik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists