linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/19] Staging: xgifb: Rework conditions in XGI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 5 Jul 2012 21:00:34 +0300
From:	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
To:	Miguel Gómez <magomez@...lia.com>
Cc:	arnaud.patard@...-net.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	dan.carpenter@...cle.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/19] Staging: xgifb: Rework conditions in
 XGI_SetLockRegs().

Hi,

On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 04:45:58PM +0200, Miguel Gómez wrote:
> +		if ((pVBInfo->VBType & VB_SIS301LV) &&
> +		    !(pVBInfo->TVInfo & TVSetHiVision)) {
> +			if ((pVBInfo->TVInfo & TVSimuMode) &&
> +			    (pVBInfo->TVInfo & TVSetPAL)) {
> +				if (pVBInfo->VBType & VB_SIS301LV) {
> +					if (!(pVBInfo->TVInfo &
> +					      (TVSetYPbPr525p |
> +					       TVSetYPbPr750p |
> +					       TVSetHiVision)))
> +						tempbx += 40;
> +				} else {
> +					tempbx += 40;

I think this could be simplified even more - both branches end up doing
the same?!

A.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/