[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF6F7CF.9000405@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 20:05:59 +0530
From: Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "mturquette@...com" <mturquette@...com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux@....linux.org.uk" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"ccross@...roid.com" <ccross@...roid.com>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Port Tegra to generic clk framework
On Friday 06 July 2012 12:19 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 07/05/2012 03:55 AM, Prashant Gaikwad wrote:
>> This patch set ports Tegra clock code to generic clock framework.
<snip>
> (The one slight difference between the 2 branches I tested is that AC100
> and Trimslice booted using DT passed in next-20120705 but failed only in
> Tegra's for-next. Otherwise, all results were identical)
>
> I'll try to investigate what the issues are since I imagine you don't
> have access to these boards. But, I probably won't be able to fix this
> until I return from vacation.
Stephen,
Can you please try removing "late_initcall(clk_disable_unused);" from
drivers/clk/clk.c?
It will keep unused clocks enabled. If it works then there should not be
any regression in this patch series but need to enable some board
specific clock.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-tegra" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists