| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAH9JG2U-_RzDQ9TgjXWSBFjscCKn0oKp1mhvOsRVoxR7hsSxHA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 23:54:41 +0900
From: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/26] mm, mpol: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> Since the NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT statistic is useless on its own; it wants
> to be compared to either a total of interleave allocations or to a miss
> count, remove it.
>
> Fixing it would be possible, but since we've gone years without these
> statistics I figure we can continue that way.
>
> This cleans up some of the weird MPOL_INTERLEAVE allocation exceptions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> ---
> drivers/base/node.c | 2 +-
> include/linux/mmzone.h | 1 -
> mm/mempolicy.c | 66 +++++++++++++++--------------------------------
> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/node.c b/drivers/base/node.c
> index 5693ece..942cdbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/node.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/node.c
> @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static ssize_t node_read_numastat(struct sys_device * dev,
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_HIT),
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_MISS),
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_FOREIGN),
> - node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT),
> + 0UL,
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_LOCAL),
> node_page_state(dev->id, NUMA_OTHER));
> }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mmzone.h b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> index 3ac040f..3a3be81 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mmzone.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mmzone.h
> @@ -111,7 +111,6 @@ enum zone_stat_item {
> NUMA_HIT, /* allocated in intended node */
> NUMA_MISS, /* allocated in non intended node */
> NUMA_FOREIGN, /* was intended here, hit elsewhere */
> - NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT, /* interleaver preferred this zone */
> NUMA_LOCAL, /* allocation from local node */
> NUMA_OTHER, /* allocation from other node */
> #endif
> diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> index c3fdbcb..2c48c45 100644
> --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> @@ -1530,11 +1530,29 @@ static nodemask_t *policy_nodemask(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy)
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +/* Do dynamic interleaving for a process */
> +static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
> +{
> + unsigned nid, next;
> + struct task_struct *me = current;
> +
> + nid = me->il_next;
> + next = next_node(nid, policy->v.nodes);
> + if (next >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> + next = first_node(policy->v.nodes);
> + if (next < MAX_NUMNODES)
> + me->il_next = next;
> + return nid;
> +}
> +
> /* Return a zonelist indicated by gfp for node representing a mempolicy */
> static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy,
> int nd)
> {
> switch (policy->mode) {
> + case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> + nd = interleave_nodes(policy);
Jut nitpick,
Original code also uses the 'unsigned nid' but now it assigned
'unsigned nid' to 'int nd' at here. does it right?
Thank you,
Kyungmin Park
> + break;
> case MPOL_PREFERRED:
> if (!(policy->flags & MPOL_F_LOCAL))
> nd = policy->v.preferred_node;
> @@ -1556,21 +1574,6 @@ static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy,
> return node_zonelist(nd, gfp);
> }
>
> -/* Do dynamic interleaving for a process */
> -static unsigned interleave_nodes(struct mempolicy *policy)
> -{
> - unsigned nid, next;
> - struct task_struct *me = current;
> -
> - nid = me->il_next;
> - next = next_node(nid, policy->v.nodes);
> - if (next >= MAX_NUMNODES)
> - next = first_node(policy->v.nodes);
> - if (next < MAX_NUMNODES)
> - me->il_next = next;
> - return nid;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Depending on the memory policy provide a node from which to allocate the
> * next slab entry.
> @@ -1801,21 +1804,6 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> -/* Allocate a page in interleaved policy.
> - Own path because it needs to do special accounting. */
> -static struct page *alloc_page_interleave(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order,
> - unsigned nid)
> -{
> - struct zonelist *zl;
> - struct page *page;
> -
> - zl = node_zonelist(nid, gfp);
> - page = __alloc_pages(gfp, order, zl);
> - if (page && page_zone(page) == zonelist_zone(&zl->_zonerefs[0]))
> - inc_zone_page_state(page, NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT);
> - return page;
> -}
> -
> /**
> * alloc_pages_vma - Allocate a page for a VMA.
> *
> @@ -1848,15 +1836,6 @@ alloc_pages_vma(gfp_t gfp, int order, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> struct page *page;
>
> get_mems_allowed();
> - if (unlikely(pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)) {
> - unsigned nid;
> -
> - nid = interleave_nid(pol, vma, addr, PAGE_SHIFT + order);
> - mpol_cond_put(pol);
> - page = alloc_page_interleave(gfp, order, nid);
> - put_mems_allowed();
> - return page;
> - }
> zl = policy_zonelist(gfp, pol, node);
> if (unlikely(mpol_needs_cond_ref(pol))) {
> /*
> @@ -1909,12 +1888,9 @@ struct page *alloc_pages_current(gfp_t gfp, unsigned order)
> * No reference counting needed for current->mempolicy
> * nor system default_policy
> */
> - if (pol->mode == MPOL_INTERLEAVE)
> - page = alloc_page_interleave(gfp, order, interleave_nodes(pol));
> - else
> - page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp, order,
> - policy_zonelist(gfp, pol, numa_node_id()),
> - policy_nodemask(gfp, pol));
> + page = __alloc_pages_nodemask(gfp, order,
> + policy_zonelist(gfp, pol, numa_node_id()),
> + policy_nodemask(gfp, pol));
> put_mems_allowed();
> return page;
> }
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists