[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341586848.7709.54.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 17:00:48 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/26] mm, mpol: Remove NUMA_INTERLEAVE_HIT
On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 23:54 +0900, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> > static struct zonelist *policy_zonelist(gfp_t gfp, struct mempolicy *policy,
> > int nd)
> > {
> > switch (policy->mode) {
> > + case MPOL_INTERLEAVE:
> > + nd = interleave_nodes(policy);
> Jut nitpick,
> Original code also uses the 'unsigned nid' but now it assigned
> 'unsigned nid' to 'int nd' at here. does it right?
node id is generally signed, we use -1 as a special value indicating no
node preference in a number of places. Not sure why it was unsigned
here. Also I think even SGI isn't anywhere near 2^31 nodes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists