linux-kernel - linux-next: comment on pm tree commit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:40:13 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: linux-next: comment on pm tree commit

Hi Rafael,

I noticed commit b8eec56cd8e5 ("PM / cpuidle: System resume hang fix with
cpuidle") in the pm tree needs some work (I noticed it because it was
changed in a rebase ...).

diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
index a6b3f2e..b90ccb2 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
@@ -146,6 +146,8 @@ extern void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
 
 extern void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void);
 extern void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void);
+extern void cpuidle_pause(void);
+extern void cpuidle_resume(void);
 extern int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
 extern void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
 extern int cpuidle_wrap_enter(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
@@ -169,6 +171,8 @@ static inline void cpuidle_unregister_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev) { }
 
 static inline void cpuidle_pause_and_lock(void) { }
 static inline void cpuidle_resume_and_unlock(void) { }
+static inline cpuidle_pause(void) { }
+static inline cpuidle_resume(void) { }

These need to be "static inline void".  I wonder what review and build
testing this went through (the above should produce warnings since they
are non void returning functions with no return statements).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped