[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FF9A337.2010006@nod.at>
Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2012 17:11:51 +0200
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
CC: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, Heinz.Egger@...utronix.de,
thomas.wucher@...utronix.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
tim.bird@...sony.com, Marius.Mazarel@...l.ro,
artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com, nyoushchenko@...sta.com
Subject: Re: UBI fastmap updates
Am 08.07.2012 14:07, schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Hi Shmulik!
>
> Am 08.07.2012 13:47, schrieb Shmulik Ladkani:
>> +
>> + /* TODO: if find_fastmap==1, we do not enter this block at all.
>> + * shouldn't we? shouldn't we care of compatability of unknown
>> + * internal volumes OTHER than the fastmap ones, even if
>> + * find_fastmap==1?
>> + */
>> +
>
> If find_fastmap=1 we scan only the first 64 PEBs (now by using scan_peb()).
> When using fastmap can do not care about compatibility of unknown internal volumes
> at all.
> Fastmap keeps only track of known (and compatible volumes).
> Taking care of unknown internal volumes would imply a full scan.
Please forget the above statement.
We have to think of the case where no fastmap was found and the
64 scanned PEBs get reused by scan_all().
Thanks for pointing this out!
Thanks,
//richard
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists