linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: suppress uprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120709100920.GA21163@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:09:20 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: suppress uprobe_munmap() from mmput()

On 07/09, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 22:30 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > uprobe_munmap() does get_user_pages() and it is also called from
> > the final mmput()->exit_mmap() path. This slows down exit/mmput()
> > for no reason, and I think  it is simply dangerous/wrong to try to
> > fault-in a page into the dying mm. If nothing else, this happens
> > after the last sync_mm_rss(), afaics handle_mm_fault() can change
> > the task->rss_stat and make the subsequent check_mm() unhappy.
> >
> > Change uprobe_munmap() to check mm->mm_users != 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/events/uprobes.c |    3 +++
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > index a93b6df..47c4e24 100644
> > --- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > +++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
> > @@ -1082,6 +1082,9 @@ void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned lon
> >  	if (!atomic_read(&uprobe_events) || !valid_vma(vma, false))
> >  		return;
> >
> > +	if (!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->mm_users)) /* called by mmput() ? */
> > +		return;
> > +
> >  	if (!atomic_read(&vma->vm_mm->uprobes_state.count))
> >  		return;
> >
>
> But won't you leak uprobe refcounts like this? Those aren't tied to the
> task (which is dying) but to the vma's mapping the appropriate hunk of
> the text. Not doing the munmap will then not put the uprobe->ref..

No, mmap/munmap do not participate in uprobe refcounting. This code
does put_uprobe() for each uprobe, yes, but only because the counter
was incremented in build_probe_list().

uprobe_munmap() is only needed to decrement mm->uprobes_state.count,
but nobody except uprobe_munmap() itself will use it after mmput().

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/