linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: suppress uprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:13:25 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] uprobes: suppress uprobe_munmap() from mmput()

On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 12:09 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> No, mmap/munmap do not participate in uprobe refcounting. This code
> does put_uprobe() for each uprobe, yes, but only because the counter
> was incremented in build_probe_list().
> 
> uprobe_munmap() is only needed to decrement mm->uprobes_state.count,
> but nobody except uprobe_munmap() itself will use it after mmput(). 

OK, that also answers my other question.

Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/