linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACQ1gAhOtCTVVnSvso1-jq+MyminKC2i244d9je=v0acAzzRBw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:15:17 +0200
From:	Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
To:	Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] ubi: Limit amount of reserved eraseblocks for bad PEB handling

2012/7/4 Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>:
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c
> index f6a7d7a..e9dcb83 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/misc.c
> @@ -98,10 +98,18 @@ int ubi_check_volume(struct ubi_device *ubi, int vol_id)
>   */
>  void ubi_calculate_reserved(struct ubi_device *ubi)
>  {
> -       ubi->beb_rsvd_level = ubi->good_peb_count/100;
> -       ubi->beb_rsvd_level *= CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BEB_RESERVE;
> -       if (ubi->beb_rsvd_level < MIN_RESEVED_PEBS)
> -               ubi->beb_rsvd_level = MIN_RESEVED_PEBS;
> +       /*
> +        * Calculate the actual number of PEBs currently needed to be reserved
> +        * for future bad eraseblock handling.
> +        */
> +       ubi->beb_rsvd_level = ubi->bad_peb_limit - ubi->bad_peb_count;
> +       if (ubi->beb_rsvd_level < 0) {
> +               ubi->beb_rsvd_level = 0;
> +               ubi_warn("number of bad PEBs (%d) is above the expected limit "
> +                        "(%d), not reserving any PEBs for bad PEB handling, "
> +                        "will use available PEBs (if any)",
> +                        ubi->bad_peb_count, ubi->bad_peb_limit);
> +       }
>  }
is it ok for beb_rsvd_level to be in the range [0..x[ instead of [2..x[ ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/