linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Have printk() never buffer its data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1341854107.6118.11.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jul 2012 10:15:07 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>, Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Have printk() never buffer its data

On Mon, 2012-07-09 at 10:09 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> is it ok if we
> just merge this in 3.6-rc1 and backport it to 3.5.1 if it looks ok
> there?

I'd prefer it get accepted now so that refactoring the
printk subsystem could occur for 3.6.

Another option would be to revert all Kay's changes to the
printk subsystem, fix this in 3.6 and refactor in 3.7.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/