[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1341870165.6118.42.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:42:45 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay@...y.org>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@...ling.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] printk: Have printk() never buffer its data
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 19:55 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> At the same time the CPU#2 prints the same warning with a continuation
> line, but the buffer from CPU#1 can not be flushed to the console, nor
> can the continuation line printk()s from CPU#2 be merged at this point.
> The consoles are still locked and busy with replaying the old log
> messages, so the new continuation data is just stored away in the record
> buffer as it is coming in.
> If the console would be registered a bit earlier, or the warning would
> happen a bit later, we would probably not see any of this.
>
> I can fake something like this just by holding the console semaphore
> over a longer time and printing continuation lines with different CPUs
> in a row.
>
> The patch below seems to work for me. It is also here:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kay/patches.git;a=blob;f=kmsg-merge-cont.patch;hb=HEAD
>
> It only applies cleanly on top of this patch:
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kay/patches.git;a=blob;f=kmsg-syslog-1-byte-read.patch;hb=HEAD
>
Hi Kay.
I just ran a test with what's in Greg's driver-core -for-linus branch.
One of the differences in dmesg is timestamping of consecutive
pr_<level>("foo...)
followed directly by
pr_cont("bar...")
For instance: (dmesg is 3.4, dmesg.0 is 3.5-rc6+)
# grep MAP /var/log/dm* -A1
dmesg:[ 0.781687] ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [ P0 P2 P1 P3 ]
dmesg-[ 0.781707] ata2: port disabled--ignoring
--
dmesg.0:[ 0.948881] ata_piix 0000:00:1f.2: MAP [
dmesg.0-[ 0.948883] P0 P2 P1 P3 ]
These messages originate starting at
drivers/ata/ata_piix.c:1354
All the continuations are emitted with pr_cont.
I think this output should still be coalesced without
timestamp deltas. Perhaps the timestamping code can
still be reworked to avoid too small a delta producing
a new timestamp and another dmesg line.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists