[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120710083819.GA25197@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 10:38:19 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Rubini <rubini@...dd.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm-soc tree with the
i2c-embedded tree
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:41:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm-soc tree got a conflict in
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-nomadik.c between commit af97bace2cca
> ("i2c-nomadik: move header to <linux/platform_data/i2c-nomadik.h>") from
> the i2c-embedded tree and commits 32e42c687e0a ("ARM: ux500: Remove
> unused i2c platform_data initialisation code") and 8214fd238a66 ("i2c:
> Add Device Tree support to the Nomadik I2C driver") from the arm-soc tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> Please check this and talk to each other ...
Hmm, I can't recall any discussion that the DT support patch should go
in via arm-soc. Did I miss something? Right now, I'd think it should go
in via i2c. I am fine with the other patch going in via arm-soc, but can
carry it as well.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists