lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201207121217.44910.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:17:44 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM handling based on struct dev_pm_ops

On Thursday, July 12, 2012, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > As per
> > 
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4
> > 
> > the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM
> > handling based on struct dev_pm_ops:
> > 
> > [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> > 
> > I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no
> > objections.
> 
> The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though,
> since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in
> the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd
> be in linux-next tomorrow.

Cool, thanks for handling them! :-)

> Or is there a dependency I missed?

No, there shouldn't be any.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ