linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM handling based on struct dev_pm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120712100901.GE27520@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:09:01 +0200
From:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Sonic Zhang <sonic.zhang@...log.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>,
	Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] PM / I2C: Convert platform I2C drivers to PM
 handling based on struct dev_pm_ops

On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:21:10PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> As per
> 
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133996733422413&w=4
> 
> the following patches convert some platform I2C controller drivers to the PM
> handling based on struct dev_pm_ops:
> 
> [1/7] i2c-at91: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [2/7] i2c-bfin-twi: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [3/7] i2c-ocores: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [4/7] i2c-pnx: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [5/7] i2c-puv3: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [6/7] i2c-stu300: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> [7/7] i2c-tegra: Use struct dev_pm_ops for power management
> 
> I'd like to include them into my PM pull request for 3.6 if there are no
> objections.

The changes are fine by me. I'd like to pull them in via I2C, though,
since they are changing mostly drivers for which I have other patches in
the pile and I'd like to see the conflicts myself. Is that okay? They'd
be in linux-next tomorrow. Or is there a dependency I missed?

Thanks,

   Wolfram

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)