[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120712160951.74cbb3c1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:09:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/4] hfsplus: stop using write_supers and s_dirt
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 17:26:27 +0300
Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew, here is v3 of the patches, could you please pick them instead of the
> ones you have in your tree?
I really do dislike dropping patches and replacing them. For a whole
bunch of reasons. One of which is that a wholesale replacement
requires a full re-review. Another is that wholesale replacement makes
it hard to see what was changed.
> The differences to v2 are:
>
> 1. checkpatch.pl warnings fixed
> 2. removed 'cancel_delayed_work()' from 'hfsplus_sync_fs()' because it is not
> enough to just cancel the job, we need to set the work_queued flag to zero
> as well. I could do this, but it is simpler to just remove this tiny
> optimization - we do not gain much with it. I caught this bug while doing
> some more testing.
And lo, when I look at "what was changed", I see that this patchset
actually does *not* remove the cancel_delayed_work() call. What's up
with that?
This latest patchset is identical to the code which is presently in -mm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists