linux-kernel - [PATCH v2] x86/vsyscall: allow seccomp filter in vsyscall=emulate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1342199195-2078-1-git-send-email-wad@chromium.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:06:35 -0500
From:	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	qmewlo@...il.com, eparis@...hat.com, keescook@...omium.org,
	james.l.morris@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, cevans@...omium.org,
	luto@....edu, Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/vsyscall: allow seccomp filter in vsyscall=emulate

If a seccomp filter program is installed, older static binaries and
distributions with older libc implementations (glibc 2.13 and earlier)
that rely on vsyscall use will be terminated regardless of the filter
program policy when executing time, gettimeofday, or getcpu.  This is
only the case when vsyscall emulation is in use (vsyscall=emulate is the
default).

This patch emulates system call entry inside a vsyscall=emulate by
populating regs->ax and regs->orig_ax with the system call number prior
to calling into seccomp such that all seccomp-dependencies function
normally.  Additionally, system call return behavior is emulated in line
with other vsyscall entrypoints for the trace/trap cases.

Reported-by: Owen Kibel <qmewlo@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>

v2: - fixed ip and sp on SECCOMP_RET_TRAP/TRACE (thanks to luto@....edu)
---
 arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
index 7515cf0..08a18d0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -139,6 +139,15 @@ static int addr_to_vsyscall_nr(unsigned long addr)
 	return nr;
 }
 
+static int vsyscall_seccomp(struct task_struct *tsk, int syscall_nr)
+{
+	if (!seccomp_mode(&tsk->seccomp))
+		return 0;
+	task_pt_regs(tsk)->orig_ax = syscall_nr;
+	task_pt_regs(tsk)->ax = syscall_nr;
+	return __secure_computing(syscall_nr);
+}
+
 static bool write_ok_or_segv(unsigned long ptr, size_t size)
 {
 	/*
@@ -174,6 +183,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 	int vsyscall_nr;
 	int prev_sig_on_uaccess_error;
 	long ret;
+	int skip;
 
 	/*
 	 * No point in checking CS -- the only way to get here is a user mode
@@ -205,9 +215,6 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 	}
 
 	tsk = current;
-	if (seccomp_mode(&tsk->seccomp))
-		do_exit(SIGKILL);
-
 	/*
 	 * With a real vsyscall, page faults cause SIGSEGV.  We want to
 	 * preserve that behavior to make writing exploits harder.
@@ -222,8 +229,13 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 	 * address 0".
 	 */
 	ret = -EFAULT;
+	skip = 0;
 	switch (vsyscall_nr) {
 	case 0:
+		skip = vsyscall_seccomp(tsk, __NR_gettimeofday);
+		if (skip)
+			break;
+
 		if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(struct timeval)) ||
 		    !write_ok_or_segv(regs->si, sizeof(struct timezone)))
 			break;
@@ -234,6 +246,10 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 		break;
 
 	case 1:
+		skip = vsyscall_seccomp(tsk, __NR_time);
+		if (skip)
+			break;
+
 		if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(time_t)))
 			break;
 
@@ -241,6 +257,10 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 		break;
 
 	case 2:
+		skip = vsyscall_seccomp(tsk, __NR_getcpu);
+		if (skip)
+			break;
+
 		if (!write_ok_or_segv(regs->di, sizeof(unsigned)) ||
 		    !write_ok_or_segv(regs->si, sizeof(unsigned)))
 			break;
@@ -253,6 +273,12 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 
 	current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error = prev_sig_on_uaccess_error;
 
+	if (skip) {
+		if ((long)regs->ax <= 0L) /* seccomp errno emulation */
+			goto do_ret;
+		goto done; /* seccomp trace/trap */
+	}
+
 	if (ret == -EFAULT) {
 		/* Bad news -- userspace fed a bad pointer to a vsyscall. */
 		warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_INFO, regs,
@@ -271,10 +297,11 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 
 	regs->ax = ret;
 
+do_ret:
 	/* Emulate a ret instruction. */
 	regs->ip = caller;
 	regs->sp += 8;
-
+done:
 	return true;
 
 sigsegv:
-- 
1.7.9.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/