lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342647716.3010.40.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 15:41:56 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	imammedo@...hat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:27 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:40 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > This patch introduces acpi_pr_<level>(), where <level> is a message
> > level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages
> > for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations.
> 
> One more note:
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> []
> > @@ -454,3 +454,35 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
> []
> > +void
> > +acpi_printk(const char *level, acpi_handle handle, const char *fmt, ...)
> []
> > +	struct acpi_buffer buffer = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER};
> []
> > +	ret = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> []
> > +	kfree(buffer.pointer);
> 
> There's a failure mode here because buffer.pointer
> isn't guaranteed to be initialized or set to NULL.

Hi Joe,

Yes, I thought that check was necessary as well.  However, to my
surprise, such check caused the following warning message from
patchcheck.pl.  So, I deleted the check...

# check for needless kfree() checks
                if ($prevline =~ /\bif\s*\(([^\)]*)\)/) {
                        my $expr = $1;
                        if ($line =~ /\bkfree\(\Q$expr\E\);/) {
                                WARN("NEEDLESS_KFREE",
                                     "kfree(NULL) is safe this check is
probably not required\n" . $hereprev);
                        }
                }

Thanks,
-Toshi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ