[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1342648452.2215.12.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:54:12 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, liuj97@...il.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@...hat.com,
imammedo@...hat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 15:41 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:21 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:40 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > This patch introduces acpi_pr_<level>(), where <level> is a message
> > > level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages
> > > for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations. acpi_pr_<level>() appends
> > > "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path to the messages. This improves
> > > diagnostics in hotplug operations since it identifies an object that
> > > caused an issue in a log file.
[]
> > I'd be tempted to instead make the calls more like
> > other <subsystem>_<level> uses and rename these to
> > acpi_<level> and change the existing acpi_info to
> > another name.
[]
> I agree with you. Unfortunately, the ACPI CA (ACPI FW interpreter)
> already uses them for its internal-use as follows, so I needed to come
> up with some other name... Hence, acpi_pr_<level>.
>
> /*
> * Error reporting. Callers module and line number are inserted by AE_INFO,
> * the plist contains a set of parens to allow variable-length lists.
> * These macros are used for both the debug and non-debug versions of the code.
> */
> #define ACPI_INFO(plist) acpi_info plist
> #define ACPI_WARNING(plist) acpi_warning plist
> #define ACPI_EXCEPTION(plist) acpi_exception plist
> #define ACPI_ERROR(plist) acpi_error plist
> #define ACPI_DEBUG_OBJECT(obj,l,i) acpi_ex_do_debug_object(obj,l,i)
I wouldn't have a problem renaming a few of those to
something like:
#define ACPI_INFO(plist) acpi_old_info plist
#define ACPI_WARNING(plist) acpi_old_warning plist
#define ACPI_ERROR(plist) acpi_old_error plist
The acpi folk might though.
> > Other than that, seems fine to me.
> Great! Can I consider it as Ack? :)
Fix the kfree first.
I rarely ack stuff as other people generally have to
pick up the changes and I think acks are overrated.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists