linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1342651966.3010.66.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:52:46 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	shuah.khan@...com
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, liuj97@...il.com,
	srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@...hat.com,
	imammedo@...hat.com, vijaymohan.pandarathil@...com,
	shuahkhan@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 16:40 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 16:26 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 15:59 -0600, Shuah Khan wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:40 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > This patch introduces acpi_pr_<level>(), where <level> is a message
> > > > level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages
> > > > for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations.  acpi_pr_<level>() appends
> > > > "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path to the messages.  This improves
> > > > diagnostics in hotplug operations since it identifies an object that
> > > > caused an issue in a log file.
> > > > 
> > > > acpi_pr_<level>() takes acpi_handle as an argument, which is passed
> > > > to ACPI hotplug notify handlers from the ACPI CA.  Therefore, it is
> > > > always available unlike other kernel objects, such as device.
> > > > 
> > > > For example, the statement below
> > > >   acpi_pr_err(handle, "Device don't exist, dropping EJECT\n");
> > > > logs an error message like this:
> > > >   ACPI: \_SB_.SCK4.CPU4: Device don't exist, dropping EJECT
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/acpi/utils.c    |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  include/acpi/acpi_bus.h |   18 ++++++++++++++++++
> > > >  2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/utils.c b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > > > index 3e87c9c..4097266 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/acpi/utils.c
> > > > @@ -454,3 +454,35 @@ acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost(acpi_handle handle, u32 source_event,
> > > >  #endif
> > > >  }
> > > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost);
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * acpi_printk: Print messages with ACPI prefix and object path
> > > > + *
> > > > + * This function is intended to be called through acpi_pr_<level> macros.
> > > > + */
> > > > +void
> > > > +acpi_printk(const char *level, acpi_handle handle, const char *fmt, ...)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	struct va_format vaf;
> > > > +	va_list args;
> > > > +	struct acpi_buffer buffer = {ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER};
> > > > +	char *path;
> > > > +	acpi_status ret;
> > > > +
> > > > +	va_start(args, fmt);
> > > > +
> > > > +	vaf.fmt = fmt;
> > > > +	vaf.va = &args;
> > > > +
> > > > +	ret = acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);
> > > 
> > > One big problem I see with this approach is now each acpi_printk() will
> > > result in a call to acpi_get_name() which will invoke several ACPI
> > > calls, including a call to acpi_ut_initialize_buffer() which allocates
> > > buffer. Is this really warranted? What is the performance impact of this
> > > change?
> > 
> > Hi Shuah,
> > 
> > This interface is intended to be used by acpi_pr_<level>(), which is
> > used for error, warning, debugging, etc.  It is not intended to be used
> > in any performance path.
> > 
> 
> How does one enable this interface to see errors, warns, debugging? Is
> there a special mode kernel needs to run in? I am trying to understand
> what you mean by "not intended to be used in any performance path". Does
> one build a special kernel similar to CONFIG_VM_DEBUG (just happen to
> the one I could think off) ?

acpi_pr_<level>() calls printk() with a corresponding message level,
such as KERN_ERR, KERN_WARNING and KERN_DEBUG, which is by definition
used for error, warning and debugging messages.  Let me know if the
change log was not clear about this.  Anyway, I think one should not use
a printk() in performance path in the first place...

BTW, I realized that I forgot to define acpi_pr_debug()! (duh)  I will
update the patch to define it.


Thanks,
-Toshi


> -- Shuah
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/