[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5007E0FE.4030602@mev.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 11:27:10 +0100
From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To: Ian Abbott <ian.abbott@....co.uk>
CC: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 30/90] staging: comedi: amplc_dio200: store the pci_dev
in the comedi_device
On 2012-07-19 11:10, Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 2012-07-19 02:37, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> Use the hw_dev pointer in the comedi_device struct to hold the
>> pci_dev instead of carrying it in the private data.
>>
>> Since the pci_dev is no longer held in the provate data, we can
>> also cleanup the detach a bit. Remove the IS_ENABLED() tests in
>> the detach. If the pci_dev is non NULL it's a PCI device otherwise
>> it's an ISA device. Using IS_ENABLED() to omit the code paths
>> makes the code a bit confusing and doesn't save much.
>
> No, you really need to check thisboard->bustype in the detach() because
> hw_dev might be NULL for a PCI board if the attach() failed.
Actually, your patch wouldn't do any harm as dev->iobase would be 0. It
would just go through the "failed ISA device" path instead of the
"failed PCI device" path. It would be more robust to check
thisboard->bustype though.
--
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=-
-=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=-
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists